Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 03:19:21
Server time: 00:40:38, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Empire Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kanjoran Imperial Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2118

Description[?]:

Because the Kanjoran Empire sounds cooler...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:11:38, September 26, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
MessageI strongly oppose.

Date05:25:20, September 26, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
MessageSo do we.

Date00:28:45, September 27, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
MessageWe'd like to add that monarchs are expensive. A very high amount of money is spent to keep a royal family living like royals. That money would be much better used elsewhere.

Date01:19:20, September 27, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
MessageNot true. In England, the monarchy only costs a couple pounds per person every year.

Date01:28:31, September 27, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
MessageAnd when you add up 2 pounds per person in Britain ......calculate calculate......that's 120,882,914 per year. What a wonderful way to spend a country's money. Besides, we don't need a monarchy anyway. It's useless to create one out of nothing because it has no tradition or historical backing. Also, this government should be for the people and by the people, not for the royal few paid for by the people.

Date06:48:54, September 27, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
Messageyeah, good point. It just sounds cooler in name though. The kings do not have to be rich. We could make them just look happy and wealthy.

Date01:34:31, September 29, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
MessageWOW! We're a monarchy!

Date01:40:33, September 29, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
MessageOh no, never mind

Date05:21:04, September 29, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
MessageAs per a deal I agreed to that anyone can read here:

http://s13.invisionfree.com/The_Kanjori_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8

...the PLP is agreeing to support this bill as its part of the deal.

Date05:24:28, September 29, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
Message... Proof that the legal contracts are in fact very useful

Date05:55:26, September 29, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Empire Bill
Message... Proof that the legal contracts are in fact very useful

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 401

no
   

Total Seats: 198

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

    Random quote: "The substance of the eminent Socialist gentlemen's speech is that making a profit is a sin. It is my belief that the real sin is taking a loss!" - Winston Churchill

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 62