Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 01:03:06
Server time: 14:56:53, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Archangel_1 | Caoimhean | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 2602

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2603

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:46:03, July 07, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
MessageI would lose half of my seats... :-S

Date19:25:03, July 07, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
Messageme and the ZNP could both give you another seat I suppose. which do you want? I was just trying to grab up seats before new elections ;)

Date19:31:53, July 07, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
MessageTrade
Tourism?
:-)

Date20:39:51, July 07, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
Messageok

Date20:42:20, July 07, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
Messageme and the ZNP could both give you another seat I suppose. which do you want? I was just trying to grab up seats before new elections ;)

Date20:42:42, July 07, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
Messagesorry, error

Date20:46:00, July 07, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
Messagenew cabinet here:

http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=204492&vote=yes

Date00:15:14, July 08, 2008 CET
FromNational Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
MessageThis party is new, but i would like some seats too :D

Date01:40:43, July 08, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2602
Messagewow, I didn't even know about you!

what is your political position? Same as the german NPD?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 66

no
  

Total Seats: 145

abstain
    

Total Seats: 424


Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI).

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60