Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 01:36:30
Server time: 10:23:29, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Freemarket21 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of 2604

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2604

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet, according to election laws:
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773


AFFS - 61/600 - 11% - *2s
CP - 58/600 - 9.6% - *2s
DSP - 198/600 - 33% - 4s
LSC - 0/600 - 0% - 0s
MTPU - 106/600 - 17.6% - 3s
NPP - 93/600 - 15.5% - excluded
SIP - 84/600 - 14% - 2s


As per law NPP has been excluded for voting against the cabinet.
AFFS and CP have each been given one of the two seats that would have been allocated to the NPP.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:15:44, July 11, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2604
MessageThis is a VIOLATION of the law! We have voted against the cabinet WHICH FAILED TO FOLLOW ELECTION LAWS! IF the DSP continues with this proposal, they shall be banned from ALL cabinet positions for the next 50 years!

Date06:31:08, July 11, 2008 CET
FromSekowan Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2604
MessageThen you shall have to exclude the SIP as well. After reviewing the NPP's case, we regret that we had not done so more quickly. Further cabinet proposals will be critiqued before being agreed to, as we find the mathematics to be in NPP's favor.

We will not support a cabinet proposal that does not follow election laws.

Date06:43:23, July 11, 2008 CET
FromCitizen's Communist Council
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2604
MessageCarbon Copy:

OOC:
AFFS - 1.43 1 + 1
CP - 1.248 1
DSP - 4.29 4
LSC - 0.00 0
MTPU - 2.288 2
NPP - 2.015 2
SIP - 1.82 1 + 1

Is the proper distribution, after all I should know, I did write the legislation. ;-)

We all agreed to this apportionment method in the interest of fair-play and good faith.
The Right side of the spectrum has in good faith continuously abided by it.
I'd suggest you do the same, and not just when it suits you.
Because while you have the enough seats to pass this legislation with only the help of MTPU right now, that will not always be so and the memories of those betray are indeed long.

Date18:10:24, July 11, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of 2604
MessageOOC: Ironic how DSP and I could make up the entire cabinet if we wanted to.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 304

no
   

Total Seats: 177

abstain
  

Total Seats: 119


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70