Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 03:03:58
Server time: 12:56:01, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Food Safety Regulation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Democratic Forum

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2605

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:14:49, July 12, 2008 CET
FromFederal Rutanian Libertarian Union
ToDebating the Food Safety Regulation Act
MessageWe will support this bill also.

Date16:50:03, July 12, 2008 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Food Safety Regulation Act
MessageWhy would we want to take the risk that food safety will vary from region to region, and that not all Rutanians will be gauaranteed high standard produce? This will lead to abuse and to greater ill-health for Rutanians, and the Labour Party is utterly opposed.

Date17:19:40, July 12, 2008 CET
FromRutanian Democratic Forum
ToDebating the Food Safety Regulation Act
MessageRRDF does not want that food safety varies from region to region, we just want that local governments take over control and inspection in food safety issues. This is a devolution of powers to local administration, because federal government - commonwealth should not do this job.

Date19:09:38, July 12, 2008 CET
FromImperium Party
ToDebating the Food Safety Regulation Act
MessageWe do not support this responsibility to be left with local governments.

Date22:33:07, July 12, 2008 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Food Safety Regulation Act
Message"Local government chooses food safety standards"

This is not an inspection bill, but one about the basic level of standards and hygiene. We will not support any possibility that Rutanians in one region (and almost certainly the poorest because they have less money to buy high quality food) should be left with potentially unsafe foodstuffs.

Date01:02:17, July 13, 2008 CET
FromRutanian Democratic Forum
ToDebating the Food Safety Regulation Act
MessageYeah, but this:
"The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions."

is an inspection bill, so it gives right and duty to government officials to control food safety standards. This could be OK in unitary country, but our Commonwealth is not that, and RRDF does not support unitarism, we are federalists (although moderate, our political positions are not "unitarist leaning", :))

Date14:23:25, July 13, 2008 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Food Safety Regulation Act
MessageYes, but now we cannot guarantee the food safety of all citizens of this country, and that is not acceptable. Some matters should decided locally, but there must uniform national standards in areas like health or food consumption and standards.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 369

no
  

Total Seats: 154

abstain
   

Total Seats: 76


Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German").

Random quote: "The best politics is right action." - Mahatma Gandhi

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63