We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ecology Act #2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party of Lodamun
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2605
Description[?]:
We in the Progress Party have long been working around the Enviroment. And we are soon to release a major Enviroment plan, to secure the Enviroment and Economy at the same time. As we need to combat Oil dependancy and other factors which are not healthy for our Nation. We propose to change to moderate restrictions, this is because the highly restrictive restrictions are destroying industries. And if we continue this, industries may have to shut down. We have to establish a whole system in order to take care of our Enviroment. This is included in our plan, and this is an essential proposal to make that plan possible. Dean Johnson Spokesman on Enviroment and Tourism |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:33:31, July 12, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Ecology Act #2 |
Message | Any proof to your statement? We haven't seen any industy shutting down, so your argument is not a fact, merely an opinion. |
Date | 13:31:23, July 12, 2008 CET | From | Republican Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Ecology Act #2 |
Message | "And if we continue this, industries may have to shut down." OOC: You're claiming we have the best education system, where's the proof of that? We have to RP this, and if I did, I'm sure you would get angry. |
Date | 18:24:02, July 12, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Ecology Act #2 |
Message | OOC: You can RP anything. I cannot get angry because you RP something that might be reasonable. If our economy is growing, it is kind of impossible to have industries shutting down. You know that. I only get angry when someone RPs something out of this world (URRA, for example). |
Date | 18:45:08, July 12, 2008 CET | From | Republican Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Ecology Act #2 |
Message | Well, pure logic says that it's not making it easier for industry. In other means, the industry may have created more jobs if there were less regulation. |
Date | 04:10:10, July 13, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Ecology Act #2 |
Message | Again, those are predictions at best. |
Date | 04:14:30, July 13, 2008 CET | From | Republican Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Ecology Act #2 |
Message | In all of my comments I include a "may" but it is clear, the more regulation, taxation and problems you put on corporations and businesses in general, you will make it more difficult for them to drive their corporation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 67 | |||
no | Total Seats: 52 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 31 |
Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
Random quote: "Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man." - Stewart Udall |