Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 00:46:18
Server time: 19:13:41, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Mrcricketer0001 | Mrcricketer001 | VojmatDun | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: DSP.222.2605

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2605

Description[?]:

Positioning.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:19:24, July 13, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
MessageIt is disgusting that the DSP would once again post a bill they would vote against which combined completely unrelated issues. We are forced to vote for, though we find the divorce issue unacceptable and the flag issue onerous.

Date06:20:53, July 13, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
MessageThey are all civil rights issues.

Date06:44:52, July 13, 2008 CET
From Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
MessageWell, then your coherency is horrid.

Date06:45:16, July 13, 2008 CET
From Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
MessageSo you destroy the rest of our coherency. It's abominable.

Date06:48:59, July 13, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
MessageThe coherency thing never got implemented, so it does'nt matter if you voted restrictive on two bills and permissive on two others.

Date07:57:58, July 13, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
MessageLike the NPP and AFFS, we support some and oppose some articles. We will vote for in protest.

Date03:09:21, July 14, 2008 CET
From Sekowan Independent Party
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
MessageOOC: As an aside, shouldn't this be the kind of game you play to enjoy, not play to win? There's more to a game than just getting the highest score...

Date05:59:13, July 14, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
MessageOOC:
Well, you can't really win, I mean I guess you could buy a nation (it's happened twice) and rule it that way and win in that way.

Honestly I just dont like my positioning to be different from what it should be.

Date06:42:47, July 14, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the DSP.222.2605
Message[[Then you should honestly vote in ways that put your positioning where it should be. Duh.]]

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 212

no
    

Total Seats: 388

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: When you join the game, you will find yourself with only zero seats. That's because your party's representatives haven't been elected yet. You need to establish your party's position on issues by proposing several bills that your party wants passed and sending them to vote. This raises your visibility and if you do it enough, you will win seats at the next election.

    Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 90