Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 00:07:28
Server time: 07:52:31, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Scrutiny Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kurui

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2607

Description[?]:

It is not enough to judge a priest by his or her religion where many taint the names of the deities and forces at work we believe in. Not only should we allow the regions more say in their ministerial selections, but also allow a further degree of character assessment at the international level.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:49:10, July 14, 2008 CET
FromHulstria Reactionary Party
ToDebating the Religious Scrutiny Act
MessageI am not fully sure if I can agree on article 2 of this bill. mainly because the Imperal party does not believe that the religion of its people is a choice that is to important to be left up to the local government. We do on the other hand support Article 1 of this bill.

Date14:25:37, July 14, 2008 CET
FromTraditional Conservative's Party
ToDebating the Religious Scrutiny Act
MessageHmm, we are the opposite of the Imperal Party. The TCP is a supporter of giving for power to local governments. However, even though we think registering with the Foriegn Ministrey is enough, we will vote for this bill, for the time being.

Date03:12:18, July 15, 2008 CET
FromWiedervereinigten Nationalisten
ToDebating the Religious Scrutiny Act
MessageWe share the TCP's commitment to devolution of power to the Crownlands, indeed the HNP was the first Hulstrian party that explicitly endorsed decentralisation, however, we do not think it's wise to devolve matters of religion to the Crownlands. We have a state church that is established nationally, and therefore having five separate policies in the Crownlands on how to deal with it's ministers and the ministers of other faiths will not, in our opinion, be conducive.

On the subject of foreign missionaries, we believe that if the current governmental policy is altered, it should be changed to the option that allows the government to selectively approve the missionaries of certain faith groups and reject missionaries that propagate undesirable beliefs. The crisis with the Mormons almost two centuries ago demonstrates why this would be beneficial.

Date02:02:51, July 16, 2008 CET
FromTraditional Conservative's Party
ToDebating the Religious Scrutiny Act
MessageWe must agree with the HNP.

Date02:33:12, July 17, 2008 CET
FromHulstria Reactionary Party
ToDebating the Religious Scrutiny Act
MessageThe Imperal party must vote no on this

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 68

no
    

Total Seats: 314

abstain
  

Total Seats: 118


Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account.

Random quote: "Capitalism is the only system that can make freedom, individuality, and the pursuit of values possible in practice." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61