We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Border Control Bill, 2116
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Dynamist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2118
Description[?]:
This would establish essential security measures so as to prevent abuse. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Current: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Proposed: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes no border controls on visitors.
Current: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Proposed: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:46:26, September 26, 2005 CET | From | Social Dynamist Party | To | Debating the Border Control Bill, 2116 |
Message | We would be willing to split the bill if any party felt strongly enough, but since these both cover a very specific overlap between foreign policy and security and could also be co-ordinated together, there is some merit in including them in the same bill. |
Date | 23:48:12, September 26, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Border Control Bill, 2116 |
Message | I believe we can agree to this proposal. |
Date | 01:13:19, September 28, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Border Control Bill, 2116 |
Message | We'll toss our support behind it. |
Date | 02:56:46, September 28, 2005 CET | From | Inactive | To | Debating the Border Control Bill, 2116 |
Message | We can support. |
Date | 00:52:25, September 29, 2005 CET | From | Social Dynamist Party | To | Debating the Border Control Bill, 2116 |
Message | Excellent. Sorry about the short description - it's a fairly self-explanatory issue. |
Date | 17:13:32, September 29, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Poultry Party | To | Debating the Border Control Bill, 2116 |
Message | Due to a firmly held opposition to borders, nations and restrictions on individuals right to travel, the Anarcho-Poultry party is unable to support this Bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 299 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles." - Niccolo Machiavelli |