Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 00:51:13
Server time: 23:08:46, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): gattus | hexaus18 | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Land Redistribution Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kirlawan National Party (Leftists)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2607

Description[?]:

We here at the DSP believe that having a rural aristrocracy helps breed an oppressive and unfair nation, where certain people own all the land of Kirlawa, and become insanely wealthy. Not only this, but their children are able to inherit this dominance, which means that certain families are able to rule over us forever. This is against the democratic ideals of Kirlawa, of our strong belief, every single one of us, communist to libertarian, that social mobility is vital to our people and society. Social mobility cannot be achieved if certain children inherit humongous amounts of wealth and land, keeping the common man down. So let us say no to the aristrocrats, and yes to social mobility!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:28:16, July 16, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan National Party (Leftists)
ToDebating the Land Redistribution Bill
MessageWe believe that having certain families own our land is unjust and immoral, and restricts social mobility. Therefore, we say yes to this bill.

Date06:20:53, July 16, 2008 CET
FromGluaiseacht ShaorĂ¡il DhaonlathachIt
ToDebating the Land Redistribution Bill
MessageWe say No. You cannot punish people for being entrepreneurs. Jealousy is a bad advisor.

Date11:43:48, July 16, 2008 CET
FromFront for Popular Liberation
ToDebating the Land Redistribution Bill
Messagewe support

Date11:43:48, July 16, 2008 CET
FromFront for Popular Liberation
ToDebating the Land Redistribution Bill
Messagewe support

Date17:46:46, July 16, 2008 CET
FromMovement for Democratic Change
ToDebating the Land Redistribution Bill
MessageWe agree with the DFM. What's next, taking away people's antique cars they don't drive?

Date19:05:59, July 16, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Party
ToDebating the Land Redistribution Bill
MessageWe do not agree with this. This is paramount to mandatory eminent domain on any large farm, and a tax on success.

Date02:00:07, July 17, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan People's Justice Party
ToDebating the Land Redistribution Bill
MessageAlthough we disagree with some of the libertarians' claims here, we also don't want some bureaucrat telling a farmer that his family's farm has been declared to be "too large" and seizing part or all of it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 402

no
     

Total Seats: 315

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players.

    Random quote: "I believe in an America where millions of Americans believe in an America that's the America millions of Americans believe in. That's the America I love." - Mitt Romney

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 73