We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Power Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Berosian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2607
Description[?]:
Nuclear power being efficient, powerful, and surprisingly eco-friendly, it should be allowed in our country. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:09:17, July 16, 2008 CET | From | Spenocratic Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act |
Message | We prefer to have no position on it, but its better than banning it. |
Date | 21:44:21, July 16, 2008 CET | From | Traditional Conservative Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act |
Message | We prefer this beeing up to local governments, but like the CCP said, this is better than having it banned. |
Date | 23:53:36, July 16, 2008 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act |
Message | Both the CCP and the TCP express opinions, and vote on them - rather than providing any logical justification. We find that, frankly, detestable. Nuclear power is dangerous. That is reason enough to control it. It ALSO produces a form of waste that simply cannot be removed from the environment, only shunted from place to place. There is no logic to allowing freer access to nuclear volatiles. |
Date | 05:22:08, July 17, 2008 CET | From | Berosian Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act |
Message | Nuclear power is dangerous in the same sense that an unlit stick of dynamite that is nowhere near a flame is dangerous. While both have the potential for disaster, neither are even close to realizing that potential. |
Date | 07:12:04, July 17, 2008 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act |
Message | The Berosian Party talk tot. Nuclear power is inherently dangerous, because it yields a waste product that cannot be de-toxified. Add to that the fact that meltdown (a fairly unlikely result) is not the only way in which a nuclear plant can critically fail - just the most spectacular, and you find that nuclear reactors are actually a lot more dangerous than the low incidence of catastrophic self-destruction suggests. And that's before we even look at issues like potential for terrorism. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 31 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 44 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules. |
Random quote: "Apparently, a democracy is a place where numerous elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable candidates." - Gore Vidal |