We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2607
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progress and Liberty Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2607
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Sons of Liberty
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Sons of Liberty
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Freeminded People's Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Sons of Liberty
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Freeminded People's Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Sons of Liberty
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Progress and Liberty Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Progress and Liberty Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Freeminded People's Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Progress and Liberty Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Progress and Liberty Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Progress and Liberty Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Freeminded People's Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:12:55, July 17, 2008 CET | From | Progress and Liberty Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2607 |
Message | This is aimed at recovering Libertarian control of the Cabinet. The fascistic PPP may be the Gravis and majority leader of the Lexate, but it hardly has an iron grip on power. We must keep it that way, for our people's sake. |
Date | 07:37:21, July 17, 2008 CET | From | Sons of Liberty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2607 |
Message | The Libertarian control is indeed available to us. It will be a tight squeeze, but we'll keep hold on individual liberties and the free market. |
Date | 12:29:25, July 17, 2008 CET | From | Dranland First Party (CC) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2607 |
Message | OOC: Libertarians be damned! :P |
Date | 21:12:25, July 17, 2008 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2607 |
Message | We support this, only because it regains cabinet control for Libertarians, though we feel we deserve a place on the cabinet |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 144 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 121 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "Unlike the world of free-markets, in political government when some individuals win, other individuals lose." - Robert Klassen |