We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DNA Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Red Tory Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2608
Description[?]:
| We need to keep track of all our convicted felons, for the risk of re offending is well known for being high. This is for the safety of our citizens. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the use of forensic DNA databases.
Old value:: No DNA is recorded.
Current: Only DNA from persons convicted of crime is recorded.
Proposed: Only DNA from persons convicted of crime is recorded.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:11:32, July 18, 2008 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the DNA Act |
| Message | The Red Tories seek to increase freedom, and reduce government involvement... by starting up a secretpolice force? |
| Date | 06:37:26, July 21, 2008 CET | From | Red Tory Party | To | Debating the DNA Act |
| Message | What better kind of police force? |
| Date | 07:17:04, July 21, 2008 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the DNA Act |
| Message | One that is... not secret? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 51 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 21 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 3 |
| Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |