Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 02:16:06
Server time: 13:43:53, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Spenocracy Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Spenocratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2608

Description[?]:

I know, I know. This bill has no chance of paaing.

We just thought that everyone know the 2 core proponents of spenocracy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:56:04, July 18, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Spenocracy Act
MessageAha. Now we understand. 'Spenocracy' is another way of saying "I fell on my head (a lot) as a child".

Date20:04:47, July 18, 2008 CET
FromRed Tory Party
ToDebating the Spenocracy Act
MessageAlthough the RTP does not agree with this bill, we feel that the Sturm und Drung comments were completely out of order. This is the kind of unorthodox behaviour typical of our pathetic current government.

Date20:55:49, July 18, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Spenocracy Act
MessageRTP feeling some empathy for the Spenocrats: Between the two parties, I bet there's a phrenologist's dream...

Date22:42:05, July 18, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Spenocracy Act
MessageGun ownership is mandatory, Tory? Compulsary-but-not-specific religion, Tory?

That strikes you as a rational platform? It makes us think 'blunt-force trauma'.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
      

Total Seats: 72

abstain
 

Total Seats: 3


Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60