Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5470
Next month in: 01:48:07
Server time: 18:11:52, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Gov.0014.2609

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2612

Description[?]:

Upon the passing of this legislation with atleast a simple majority of the legislature the following Ministries and Minister titles shall be renamed the following;


Foreign Affairs;
- Department of Foreign Affairs
- Secretary of Foreign Affairs

Internal Affairs;
- Department of Internal Affairs
- Secretary of Internal Affairs

Finances;
- Department of Economy & Finances
- Secretary of Economy & Finances

Defence;
- Department of Defence
- Secretary of Defence

Justice;
- Department of Justice
- Secretary of Justice

Infrastructure & Transport;
- Infrastructure and Transport Department
- Secretary of Infrastructure & Transportation

Health & Social Services;
- Department of Health and Social Services
- Secretary of Health & Social Services

Education;
- Department of Education
- Chief Administrator of Education

Science & Technology;
- Federal Bureau of Science & Technology
- Director of Sciences

Food & Agriculture;
- Department of Food and Agriculture
- Secretary of Food & Agriculture

Environment;
- Environmental Protection and Regulation Agency
- Secretary of the Environment

Trade & Industry;
- Department of Labour
- Secretary of Labour

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:36:22, July 22, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageOOC:
I've tried to come up with some unique ones, but since most of these positions are either called 'Ministry of' or 'Department of' in real life, it's a bit difficult to do.

Date08:12:42, July 22, 2008 CET
FromAnti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageFor a second, I thought we were voting on this. Any particular reason for the changes?

Date18:26:46, July 22, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageI'm wondering the same thing as the AFFS, though I'm not particularly opposed.

Date18:41:08, July 22, 2008 CET
FromSekowan Independent Party
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageI'm not opposed, but I'm not sure why we'd change it. I like the conformity of them all being departments or whatnot...though it is getting a bit stale. I'd vote for it, but don't really mind it one way or another.

Date22:12:00, July 22, 2008 CET
FromAnti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageYep. Same position as NPP and SIP. I dunno, will the cabinets be more active? I mean, I looked for bills in Foreign Affairs, but mainly, I'm working to secure diplomatic neutrality, to avoid war.

Date00:53:29, July 23, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageIt's meant to make us more unique, as well as using terms that actually make sense, I mean for instance it makes sense to call it the Department/Ministry of Labour rather then 'of Trade & Industry'.

The changes of course will be RP, so while they wont actually change the game titles, we'd all just use the RP titles.

Date21:50:12, July 23, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageMethinks I'm too lazy to use titles that aren't changed in game.

Date02:12:30, July 24, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageWell, I don't think ti would be a problem, I mean if you think about it, how many times do you have to as it is?
The only time they're really used is RPing on the forum, and since I'm the primary one of us that does that (though AFFS is up and coming, I figure he'll use them to) you would'nt have to worry about it.

Date02:26:02, July 24, 2008 CET
FromAnti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageAnd since when does ANYONE rp Trade and Industry?

Date03:33:42, July 24, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Gov.0014.2609
MessageWell, we used to when we had regular DCMA conferences, but apart from that, no one ever does.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 378

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
         

    Total Seats: 222


    Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner.

    Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61