We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Energy De-Regulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Solentian Corporate Communist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2119
Description[?]:
Realizing the recent poll of Republican Citizens, it is agreed upon that local governments will determine the specifics of Energy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Proposed: Energy provision is left to local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:45:23, October 01, 2005 CET | From | Solentian Corporate Communist Party | To | Debating the Energy De-Regulation Act |
Message | Due to the recent passage of an Energy Regulation bill, and no debate on this act, we will take this to a vote... |
Date | 04:08:52, October 01, 2005 CET | From | Revised Confederate Party | To | Debating the Energy De-Regulation Act |
Message | I actually was hoping the law would be defeated and it would stay in the hands of private companies but without pricing regulations. As I mentioned then, many of our party's employees hold stock in the private energy sector and fell victim to the new law. While this law is more towards the will of the people, moving energy to a local level would only further hurt the investors within this party and most likely cause turmoil. Therefor, we are unfortunately voting against this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 270 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 380 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |