Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 01:30:05
Server time: 10:29:54, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hnp19 | Kiwiis | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2609

Details

Submitted by[?]: Solentian People Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2610

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:44:44, July 22, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2609
MessageNo, obviously. You would place the keys of the Justice Ministry in the hands of a party who falsely accused the CSPS of being involved in the death of their former leader (McCain, I believe) under threat of aggression and violence?

Baltazar Harrison

Date18:48:44, July 22, 2008 CET
From Federal Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2609
MessageThis is a disgustingly partisan cabinet that defies Solentian tradition. Supreme President Leonard Bacik included every party in his cabinet with the exception of one opositionist who declared they would not work in it. This cabinet fails to include 5 of the 9 parties actively holding seats in Solentia. Any party included in this proposal that votes in the affirmative is severely partisan.

This is dispicable.

FIP Minority Leader Lucius Cicero

Date19:14:34, July 22, 2008 CET
From Solentian People Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2609
MessageI don't think this is disgusting at all, we have included four parties in this cabinet 3 of whom did the best out of all prties in election and had the majority of the votes, we have a range of differnet parties with different views in it and also FIP- I and the CMP were there during your reign in power and neither of us were included in your party, so why should I put you in mine? Your opposition has nothing to do with bi partisanship, it is about your loss of power, your bitterness to a new government and a new president and you would find something to complain about whoever was in power if you were not featured in the cabinet as your very prone to do when you dont get things your way. Why don't you go have your powermad tantrums somewhere else? Cause I am not interested!

Max Collins, Supreme President

Date21:38:27, July 22, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2609
MessageI request that Supreme President Collins invest some of his annual earnings in a spelling and grammar tutor.

Baltazar Harrison

Date22:09:58, July 22, 2008 CET
From Solentian People Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2609
MessageWell if the Taylorian party is so fantastic and perfect as they claim to be perhaps they could teach me!

Date23:05:09, July 22, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2609
MessageWhile I believe the education level of the Supreme President of our nation is of high importance, there are matters which are of conflicting import which I must attend to. I would suggest refraining from slang such as "cause" in official Presidential statements, but that is the most advice that I will give to you, Mr. Collins.

Baltazar Harrison

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 188

no
      

Total Seats: 237

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval.

    Random quote: "If we were to wake up some morning and find that everyone was the same race, creed and color, we would find some other causes for prejudice by noon." - George Aiken

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 67