Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 03:35:54
Server time: 08:24:05, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: POT's solution for a cabinet

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of the Terravore

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2614

Description[?]:

This time's serious, not another stoned proposal.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:13:54, July 29, 2008 CET
FromConservative Liberalism Party
ToDebating the POT's solution for a cabinet
MessageFor.

Date15:47:36, July 29, 2008 CET
FromPantheism Capitalistic Party UCF
ToDebating the POT's solution for a cabinet
MessageSupport

Date17:28:27, July 29, 2008 CET
FromParty of the Terravore
ToDebating the POT's solution for a cabinet
MessageThis will proceed to voting stage in the next 24 hours real time if no more contribution is added. I would love to hear anything - ANYTHING - that would help resolving the current dilemma of our cabinet.

Date06:19:47, July 30, 2008 CET
FromParty of the Terravore
ToDebating the POT's solution for a cabinet
MessageOkay, since we already have a better solution, I announce a closure to this one.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 272

no
     

Total Seats: 478

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

    Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 75