Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 02:26:58
Server time: 01:33:01, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): albaniansunited | Dx6743 | Harvey Dent | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom from Control

Details

Submitted by[?]: AM Radical Libertarian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2120

Description[?]:

WHEREAS The government holds an unfair advantage in competing with private development in the industrial arena, by virtue of the ability to set tax policy, monetary policy, and regulatory environments,

AND free competition promote effeciency in operations and marketing, by allowing the free flow of capital, labor, and finished goods,

THEREFORE we propose that the government denationalize those industries it currently owns, and remove itself from the competitive marketpalce, allowing free trade to flourish and enrich the entire nation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:21:37, September 28, 2005 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Freedom from Control
MessageSenator Dee Centralize, of Gokitan, rises to propose this measure.

"The government has beenruning industrial operations long enough to show that it is not the most efficient way of operating these areas. Sell them on the open market, raise some money for the government, and put them back on the tax roles, where they can be most profitable to their investors and to the economy at large"

Date23:24:48, September 28, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Freedom from Control
Message'On the contrary' argues Septimus Snoring, the LPE secretary for infrastructure. 'The nationalisation of the nation's most critical industries has been a resounding success. Of course the private companies have lost out, but those to whom we provide the services are reaping the benefits of a government controlled market - lower transport and water prices, emergency services who really care about saving lives, not their quotas or budget or cutting corners. Those industries privatised are not numerous enough to create a significant hole in the running of the free market, and some things should be run not primarily for profit but for the benefit of those they are intended to help. Please do not vote to remove a system that is providing services and security to so many.

Date06:01:06, September 30, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Freedom from Control
MessageIdeally, the AAP would like to see the government as a 'last-ditch' safeguard to industry - but we have to admire the purity of the RLP libertarian ideal.

Since we seem unable to pass legislation that imposes 'last-gasp' sponsorship (just because we would appreciate the 'safetynet' it would provide), the AAP is willing to offer tentative support to this positive libertarian action.

Date23:19:58, October 03, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Freedom from Control
MessageThe AAP has promoted a different, and new, alternative to this Bill, which is already at the vote.

Thus, regretfully, the AAP must vote against this Bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 68

no
   

Total Seats: 179

abstain
 

Total Seats: 28


Random fact: Did you know you can change the official name of your nation? All you need to do is draw up a new name that is in accordance with the Nation Renaming Guide, pass a bill proposing the name change with a two-thirds majority and then post a request to Moderation on the "Renaming Requests" thread. You can change city and region names in this way too.

Random quote: "The main problem of the left is that it has been traditionally divided and unable to reach agreements between different leftist views, whilst the right has almost always moved in the same direction by giving concessions to different rightist points of view." - Aelius Celer, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55