Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:05:58
Server time: 20:54:01, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (8): Archangel_1 | Arusu-Weareback | friedrich3 | hexaus18 | Liu Che | SE33 | SocDemDundorfian | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Excellent Cabinet

Details

Submitted by[?]: Goldstein Corporation

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2614

Description[?]:

»We propose this excellent cabinet. It should be noted that, while OPX enjoys nine positions now, there has been an election that changes the seats quite a bit. Here, we grant them a generous five seats. They should note that this is significant compared to any cabinet proposal that would get from the Justice and Freedom Party or the Baltusian Pantian Alliance; taking note of the fact that these two parties have a considerably greater number of seats.«
~Natasha Goldstein (Goldstein Corporation)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:49:48, July 31, 2008 CET
FromCorrupt Dealings Party
ToDebating the The Excellent Cabinet
Message"We vote yes, but wonder why the Goldstein Corporation would use their most vocal enemy to complete the majority?"
--Arnold Vogla

Date19:13:35, July 31, 2008 CET
FromGoldstein Corporation
ToDebating the The Excellent Cabinet
Message»To make a deal. But apparently, they'd rather lose more power than they have to just to avoid us...«
~Natasha Goldstein (Goldstein Corporation)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 117

no
  

Total Seats: 93

abstain
 

Total Seats: 90


Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

Random quote: "A conservative is a man who sits and thinks, mostly sits." - Woodrow Wilson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53