Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 00:19:50
Server time: 07:40:09, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Income tax proposal of February 2614

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socialist Party of Aldegar

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2614

Description[?]:

The People's Action Party propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Aldegarian Empire of the One.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:06:54, July 31, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageThis will be too much of a deficit. Not good.

Date03:14:07, July 31, 2008 CET
FromConservative Liberalism Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageCurrent tax system: 176,391,232,420 ACR
Proposed: 222,045,000,000 ACR

This is a deficit?

Date03:43:56, July 31, 2008 CET
FromSocialist Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageA progressive tax system for our nation.

Date05:32:55, July 31, 2008 CET
FromPantheism Capitalistic Party UCF
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageWhat is the point of raising taxes if we all ready have a surplus? This measures is the usual leftist rubbish that will only hurt the economy.

Date06:54:51, July 31, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageCLP, no, that comment was supposed to be for the proposed tax by the PCP one. Must have been coz of opening too much tabs.
We are inclined to support this one, but those below the 3,500 bracket are being taxed too heavily. Be more creative and progressive!

Date11:43:35, July 31, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Unity Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageThat's not a fair tax system.

Date19:21:02, July 31, 2008 CET
FromSocialist Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageThis is not fair? It is for the basis of communitarianism in our nation. What is best for all. Not some.

Date19:33:40, July 31, 2008 CET
FromFederation Aldegarian Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageWe think its fairer than the old one. what's 5% of 1 ACR anyway??

Date03:07:42, August 01, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageWe will support this for now, but we'll certainly try to push to lower those below the 3500 bracket.

Date07:31:08, August 01, 2008 CET
FromSocialist Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of February 2614
MessageWe can agree to that in the near future.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 372

no
  

Total Seats: 167

abstain
  

Total Seats: 211


Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

Random quote: "I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough." - Clarie Sargent

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 168