We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2617
Description[?]:
| An act to remove requirements for citizens to carry identity cards. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:15:56, August 04, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | The current law is overly restrictive. We must change it. |
| Date | 03:51:03, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | Was this not defeated? |
| Date | 03:53:43, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | It may still pass now. |
| Date | 03:59:15, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | Greenish Liberals opposes this. That is 30. I oppose this. That is 70. TDD opposes this. That is 105. So far that is 205 against. However. To push this over the top, Hello Kitty opposes this to. That is another 80+ votes. Defeated. |
| Date | 04:01:48, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | "Hello Kitty" is not a real party, it's just a puppet of the Liberty Party. You two really should amalgamate now. |
| Date | 04:07:09, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | Another childish insult. How pathetic that the party that the leader of our nation is in has to resort to such antics! |
| Date | 14:02:23, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Hello Kitty Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | We are a separate party Judicial Union Party. We want an apology. |
| Date | 14:05:22, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | Not until you change your name to something more dignified, perhaps "Liberty Party Lite", because you do not get 95% agreement in voting by having very different stances. |
| Date | 22:15:11, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Hello Kitty Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | Whatever tool. |
| Date | 23:04:29, August 05, 2008 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | Now you resort to insulting the names of political parties? How drool. |
| Date | 03:43:08, August 06, 2008 CET | From | Hello Kitty Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | No one said he was smart. |
| Date | 22:23:09, August 06, 2008 CET | From | al-Hizb at-Tukarali al-Qawmi al-Ijtima'i | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | If we repeal this law, our national security will be akin to a mosquito net |
| Date | 01:11:23, August 07, 2008 CET | From | Hello Kitty Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Identity Card) Amendment Act |
| Message | He does not understand that Hizb. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 209 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 291 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader |