Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5471
Next month in: 00:37:59
Server time: 03:22:00, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the CIS

Details

Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2119

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the CIS Community Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:35:35, September 29, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Ratification of the CIS
MessageIm still quite wary of this organisation. I particularly dont like the mutual defence pact.

Date03:53:16, September 29, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialists
ToDebating the Ratification of the CIS
MessageBaltusia ratified the treaty informally in January 2077, and we feel that formal ratification would be a good thing. It shows that we are commited to internationalism and economic prosperity, and since in order for the CIS to act there must be unanimous agreement among its members, if we feel that mutual defence pact will draw us into matters we don't want to be involved in, we can simply veto its application.

The organisation does carry obligations, but these are minimal compared to the potential benefits, and we can wield the veto power that all member states enjoy to ensure that CIS actions serve to benefit Baltusia. If we are outside the organisation, we cannot do this. As a result of these things, we call for the formal ratification of this treaty.

Date04:01:19, October 01, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Ratification of the CIS
MessageSeems silly then to bother having any clauses if they can be immediately vetoed. Anybody else have an opinion?

Date04:14:33, October 01, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Ratification of the CIS
MessageIt appears that many other potential members are reluctant to join. There are a number of issues from all over the place and given the unamity clause, I doubt much will happen. I would prefer to see us form good relations with our neighbours, engage in free trade under the Seleyan Free Trade Agreement and possibly get the NonWMD alliance off the ground, although with major support for that now gone, I think it shall fold as an idea.

Date12:14:03, October 01, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Ratification of the CIS
MessageIll put it to a vote to see how popular the CIS remains.

Date12:14:47, October 01, 2005 CET
From National Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the Ratification of the CIS
MessageAgreed. Move to withdraw?

Date19:09:21, October 01, 2005 CET
FromRevolutionary Socialist Alliance
ToDebating the Ratification of the CIS
MessageAlthough the RSA are an internationlaist party, we see that this community will further the cause of capitalism, rather than building true international relations and such. We don't feel that the CIS will benefit Baltusia.

Date02:46:26, October 02, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Ratification of the CIS
MessageRight. It appears to be very unpopular now. While an international organisation would be to be a part of, the system in place in this one is horrible.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 67

no
      

Total Seats: 399

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way.

    Random quote: "An economist is a surgeon with an excellent scalpel and a rough-edged lancet, who operates beautifully on the dead and tortures the living." - Nicholas Chamfort

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59