We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Income tax proposal of July 2617

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Judicial Union Party

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2618

Description^[?]:

The Judicial Union Party propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the United Tribes of Tukarali.

Proposals

Article 1

We propose to alter income tax brackets to the following setup. Information about the current income tax system can be found here.

Bracket	Tax	Estimated Revenue
> 60,000 TUK	20%	164,486,000,000 TUK
> 75,000 TUK	30%	211,963,000,000 TUK
> 90,000 TUK	35%	284,861,000,000 TUK
> 110,000 TUK	42%	1,504,536,000,000 TUK
Total		2,165,846,000,000 TUK

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	23:19:49, August 06, 2008 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2617
Message	Very soon we're going to have a massive surplus. We must return this money to the people. For some reason, parties here didn't appreciate the taxation scheme proposed, so we propose another - an across the board reduction of 3%.

Date	23:53:12, August 06, 2008 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2617
Message	HKP, do you like high taxes?

Date	00:39:10, August 07, 2008 CET
From	Hello Kitty Party
To	Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2617
Message	Nope!

Date	03:10:31, August 07, 2008 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2617
Message	And yet you vote against a reduction in taxes, how odd.

Date	13:44:42, August 07, 2008 CET
From	Liberty Party
To	Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2617
Message	Maybe you should ask why she voted against it?

Date	14:22:29, August 07, 2008 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2617
Message	Maybe the HKP should give reasons, otherwise the assumption is just that they are being contrary.

Date	20:42:07, August 07, 2008 CET
From	Liberty Party
To	Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2617
Message	Either that or you do not have a clue as to how confusing tax codes are?

Date	01:07:17, August 08, 2008 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2617
Message	The confusing part is where you allow exemptions, and have capital/revenue issues. Income tax can be kept quite simple if the legislature refrain from giving tax benefits.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 194

Tuatha D� Danann (99)

Total Seats: 99

abstain

Total Seats: 207

Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

Random quote: "Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." - Mahatma Gandhi

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 103