We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sanctions on Baltusia
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2622
Description[?]:
An act to institute sanctions on Baltusia.
(1) A ban on trade with Baltusia, except such trade as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs determines to be necessary for the well-being of the Baltusian populace, which may include essential food and medical supplies.
(2) A ban on entry into Tukarali of any Baltusian citizen, except such classes of people determined by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as being in severe humanitarian need, including refugees, but excluding any member of the government of Baltusia.
(3) A ban on all non-essential diplomatic contact. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:40:18, August 07, 2008 CET |
From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | Our northern neighbour Baltusia has been taken over by a corrupt and despotic regime which seeks to undo the peace and stability that was one the mark of the nation. We cannot sit idly by and allow Baltusia to turn into another Gaduridos. We must institute sanctions. |
| Date | 01:12:51, August 08, 2008 CET |
From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | The current government have withdrawn Baltusia from all treaties. One would assume they're not going to keep to the terms of some lesser known treaty from over 600 years ago. |
| Date | 02:01:10, August 08, 2008 CET |
From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | Unless they have officially withdrawn from said treaty Judicial Union, then the treaty is still active. |
| Date | 02:11:09, August 08, 2008 CET |
From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | That's not how treaties work. Articles 1, 3 and 4 of that treaty give us power to institute these sanctions, so even if we were somehow bound by this agreement, we would not be breaching it. |
| Date | 15:06:05, August 10, 2008 CET |
From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | OOC: Seriously, your stubbornness and lack of, you know, intelligence, makes this game so much less fun than it could be. It was a good day when you left, you should consider it again. |
| Date | 05:54:49, August 11, 2008 CET |
From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | OOC2: I am leaving again but I will be back. The only reason I am leaving is because it is my wife and I's honeymoon. |
| Date | 14:08:13, August 11, 2008 CET |
From | Hello Kitty Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | OOC: I guess it goes to show that you really do not like opposition JUP. Maybe if you were less thickheaded and more open minded, you would not be seen as a fool that you truly are. |
| Date | 14:17:20, August 11, 2008 CET |
From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | OOC: No no, opposition which understands the issues and has well-thought-out responses, that is good. The old TPP was a fun party, even though we disagreed constantly, for instance. What is not fun is when someone consistently shoots down any chance of making this game fun, just cos. This game should be more than just proposing bills, there is a whole element of RP that we don't do, for the sole reason that RP/LP and his family would prefer to be dicks about it. |
| Date | 14:24:15, August 11, 2008 CET |
From | Hello Kitty Party | To | Debating the Sanctions on Baltusia | | Message | "No no, opposition which understands the issues and has well-thought-out responses, that is good."
The problem with this is, you are not the authority on what is reason or not and you acting like you are is what makes you a closed minded fool.
As to your last comment, the RP is there Judicial Union. There is constant RPing here. You just do not like it because your bills are retarded and constantly get shot down. The only dick here is you. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 251 |
| no | Total Seats: 0 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 249 |
| Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
| Random quote: "Because democracy is not a spectator sport." - 2004 Democratic campaign slogan
|