Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 01:55:28
Server time: 10:04:31, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): itsjustgav | JWDL | RogueGAD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nobility Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Christian People's Party (IA)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2618

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:05:51, August 07, 2008 CET
FromNeo-Imperial Peoples Vanguard Party (IA)
ToDebating the Nobility Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

This just speaks volumes of possible corruption.

I yield.

Date22:32:01, August 07, 2008 CET
FromImperial Conservative Union (IA)
ToDebating the Nobility Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

It is better for those that work in this government to be loyal more to the Empire than to one "man".

Along with that, should not all those that wish to be a member of this Empire be allowed?

Finally, why not let the people elect their local leaders, it keeps them happy for they elect people they want to represent them, while they know the Emperor is looking over the Empire as a whole.

I yield.

Date23:04:27, August 07, 2008 CET
FromNeo-Imperial Peoples Vanguard Party (IA)
ToDebating the Nobility Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Indeed, their should be loyalty to the emperor, but at the cost of what discrimination to those like myself?

I stand with the questions of the Imperial Nobles, why shouldn't all members of the empire be members of the empire, why should simply how much land they control account for it?

I do believe in local elections, there is no reason we should appoint those the people could just as easily appoint. It shouldn't be a concern of the overbearing arm of big government.

I yield.

Date10:13:35, August 08, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Nobility Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

I don't want to appoint mayors.

I yield.

Date13:37:18, August 08, 2008 CET
FromSolidarity (IA)
ToDebating the Nobility Act
MessageMr Speaker

This bill opens the road to dictatorship.

Date01:34:55, August 09, 2008 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Nobility Act
MessageMr speaker,

The Head of State's representative won't be expected to appoint mayors: the Emperor will do it himself.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 78

no
     

Total Seats: 97

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

    Random quote: "The answer to global warming is in the abolition of private property and production for human need. A socialist world would place an enormous priority on alternative energy sources. This is what ecologically-minded socialists have been exploring for quite some time now." - Louis Proyect

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 77