Bill: The Pension Bill
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2118
|If people want to keep their pension system free from political interference and the effects of economic cycles, they should have the right to.|
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state operates a compulsory, public pension system.
Current: There is a compulsory private pension system.
Proposed: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
|Date||22:42:06, September 29, 2005 CET||From||Social Democratic Party of Darnussia||To||Debating the The Pension Bill|
|Message||give me more reason too vote yes|
|Date||02:50:22, September 30, 2005 CET||From||Social Democratic Party||To||Debating the The Pension Bill|
|Message||1. I've already passed it with my vote. ; )|
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Total Seats: 127
Total Seats: 45
Total Seats: 29
|Random fact: As a general convention, players should be able to provide good reasons if they want to significantly change Cultural Protocols which are less than 30 in-game years old. Where the Cultural Protocols are more than 30 in-game years old, then a change to any of the categories by 5% or less will generally be accepted without question. If the changes proposed are between 5 and 10%, then players should be prepared for the possibility of having the changes queried. If the changes proposed are over 10%, then players should always expect to need to provide strong role-play justification for the changes. Changes of over 15% will never be accepted, unless there are exceptional circumstances where this is deemed necessary to repair a situation in which a Cultural Protocol is insufficiently accessible to players.|
|Random quote: "Don't listen to what the Communists say, but look at what they do." - Nguyen Van Thieu|