We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Chemical Weapons Ban
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Centrist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2042
Description[?]:
| Chemical weapons are indiscriminate. A chemical weapons attack launched against a military installation could seriously damage a civilian town nearby if something as minor as a wind shift occurred. Furthermore, these weapons are sometimes just as insidious as nuclear weapons in one respect - some of them do not degrade biologically. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded |
From | People's Party | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Ban | | Message | I don't think its wise to disarm in the gface of external threats. Our neighbours have these weapons and can use them against us. We shouldn't put the security of our nation at risk at this time. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Ban | | Message | I'm not proposing we disarm our conventional military - if anything, that should be strengthened. However, many weapons cannot be targetted properly and do more damage to civilians than the opposition's military. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | People's Party | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Ban | | Message | Tell that to our enemies. Without any credible defense...we will be putting Likatonians at their mercy. I dont think they would listen to you..
I would support this if every other nation banned them as well..otherwise it's suicide. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Ban | | Message | If I understand correctly, we have no nuclear defence. I believe a chemical defense is kind of necessary. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Ban | | Message | I'm not exactly sure what you're saying here. I agree with the satement that chemical weapons are dangerous, but i'm not sure what you're getting at, Rakko. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Ban | | Message | It is a statement of oppostition to chemical weapons that Parliament is being invited to agree with. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | Free Radicals | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Ban | | Message | Please vote on this. Also try to introduce a bill which terraforms your nation into a giant target, it would help when everyone needs to calibrate their nuclear missiles. |
| Date | not recorded |
From | | To | Debating the Chemical Weapons Ban | | Message | Yes well, not the most helpful foreign intervention we've had... |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 41 |
| no | Total Seats: 21 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 19 |
| Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough." - Clarie Sargent |