Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 01:03:38
Server time: 22:56:21, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): AethanKal | Autokrator30 | burgerboys | Paulo Nogueira | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia

Details

Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2623

Description[?]:

"The Throne of Immeressen is honoured to present these pearls of wisdom dripping from His divine lips. Although, there is a possibility not ALL of that was wisdom pearls... some of it could have been doughnut.

Look upon freedom, and despair, Likatonia.

Immeressen shows you your demons, in His infinite Mercy.

Love Him for it."

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:40:56, August 15, 2008 CET
FromBerosian Party
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
MessageWe are EXTREMELY close on this bill. While we agree with the majority of it, there are a few articles we would like to see removed. We will have to think about this.

Date00:37:49, August 16, 2008 CET
FromPermissive Social Union
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
MessageThe LFF of course has no such hesitation id deciding the way to vote.

Date02:54:05, August 16, 2008 CET
FromRed Tory Party
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
MessageAbsolutely horrid. From the first article down we shook our heads in absolute disgust.

Abortions through the entirety of a pregnancy?! That is anarchy! Why is it okay to murder a baby 10 minutes before birth but not 3 second after? HYPOCRISY.

Date05:19:38, August 16, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
Message"There is no separate law regarding post-birth abortion. As such, our responses have to deal only with pre-birth.

If the Red Tories are so keen on post-birth abortions, we are willing to discuss it in a resolution.

But, that's one article. We notice the Red Tories are willing to vote against 11 other freedom commitments, just to make their point. We wonder how the voters will see that."

--Avar Akkad Avara

Date07:41:03, August 16, 2008 CET
FromRed Tory Party
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
MessageWe said from the first article down. Maybe the ToI should pay attention to the responses of the other parties before making any of their own.

Date07:42:30, August 16, 2008 CET
FromRed Tory Party
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
MessageAlthough we agree with article 11.

Date11:03:59, August 16, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
MessageWe can support.

Many articles go a little too far, but from where they start, that's still an improvement.

Date18:28:12, August 16, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
Message"Before the Red Tories get too excited about our responses, perhaps they should look to their own.

The Red Tories objected to the bill, but the only article they targetted for specific discussion, was the abortion one.

As such, we responded specifically to that, and pointed out the hypocrisy of voting AGAINST a freedom bill (even if you don't like the abortion clause), after the things the Interloper Regime ahs said about US"."

Date22:55:41, August 16, 2008 CET
FromRed Tory Party
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
MessageFreedom?? This is ANARCHY. What kind of communist are you?

OOC: My comment earlier was written on a PSP... Didn't exactly want to write out a paragraph with it.

Date23:38:05, August 16, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Throne Agenda: Freedom for Likatonia
MessageOOC: No problem. :-)

IC: "As we have always said, we are pro-SOCIAL liberty, even if we see need to regulate government, businesses and industry.

We are consistently twitted for our alleged attacks on freedom - well, THIS is what 'freedom' looks like."

--Avar Akkad Avara

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 286

no
    

Total Seats: 291

abstain
  

Total Seats: 89


Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current.

Random quote: "We must show that liberty is not merely one particular value but that it is the source and condition of most moral values. What a free society offers to the individual is much more than what he would be able to do if only he were free. We can therefore not fully appreciate the value of freedom until we know how a society of free men as a whole differs from one in which unfreedom prevails." - Friedrich August Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 126