Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 4459
Next month in: 03:01:50
Server time: 16:58:09, September 24, 2018 CET
Currently online (7): Adrian2001 | c0p3rn1cus | flop123 | Menkiller780 | Ryouta_12 | TrueDignity | WilderValruzianBerg | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2118

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Democratic Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2119

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:45:14, September 30, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Democratic Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2118
MessageOpinions?

Date02:53:16, September 30, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2118
MessageYeah. Where am I? Your cabinet makes no idealogical sense. I mean...c'mon...is this a capitalist party? You'd figure I'd be in it simply because I'm kinda the largest party...

...I mean...

Date04:19:49, September 30, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Democratic Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2118
MessageI was contemplating giving the Head of Government position to the LBSC, I tried to fit as many parties and give two positions to the parties involved.

Date04:27:15, September 30, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2118
MessageCoalitions of over 4 parties aren't really recommened, even by the admin. One of our first cabinet coalitions tried to do that, the admin came in and told us all to learn government (or something along those lines).

Date18:11:00, September 30, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2118
MessageLSBC getting annoyed? Since yoiu have bene the largest party for the past few years, quiet a few years, yet never been in cabinet?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 104

no
  

Total Seats: 59

abstain
   

Total Seats: 38


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself you can always write a book." Ronald Reagan (1911 - 2004)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66