Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 01:40:21
Server time: 22:19:38, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperial Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2042

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Datenot recorded
FromImperial Party
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
MessageJust a few changes.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
MessageI agree with the current proposal.

Datenot recorded
FromNew Democrats of Rutania
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
MessageWhy should the third largest party in government be the head of state and government?

New Democrats are disappointed that the SDP chose to accept this proposal rather than a more ideologically compatible coalition. Last cabinet-formation process, we fought to have the SDP included in the cabinet; our proposal gave your party significant representation. If you vote in favor of this rather than the LAP proposal, it will be remembered.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
MessageThere's a difference of only 2 seats, so we don't see why the Imperial Party shouldn't get the head of government position. They offered us that position BTW, but we declined.

We're more than happy with the positions we have now in this proposal because it gives us two positions social democrats traditionally care about a lot: health and social services, and education.

Datenot recorded
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
MessageThe LAP proposal gives you those positions as well! Don't assume we'll forget about this either, SDP.

You have no apparent reason to choose the Imperial Party's cabinet over ours. Not only does our cabinet provide you with the two seats which you apparently covet, it gives you many more besides. And though we may disagree on some economic issues, I'd imagine you will find more common ground with the LAP and ND than you do with the imperials.

Datenot recorded
FromNew Democrats of Rutania
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
Message"We're more than happy with the positions we have now in this proposal because it gives us two positions social democrats traditionally care about a lot: health and social services, and education."

You're most aligned with my party in terms of legislative voting; you may have agreed with the LAP less than the Imperial Party, but you've had less experience with Imperials. It is very disappointing that your party chose to ally with an outwardly conservative cabinet; you will no longer be considered an ideologically compatible coalition partner by the New Democrats.

Datenot recorded
FromImperial Party
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
MessageI don't think it's going to pass anyway, unless the Heritage Party wakes up soon.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
Message"It is very disappointing that your party chose to ally with an outwardly conservative cabinet"

Cabinets with both left wing and right wing parties exist around the world. Anyway, we voted in favour of the Imperial Party's proposal because our party feels it's time for economic reforms. And we feel we can best accomplish those reforms without the LAP for the time being.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
Message*economic and social reforms

Datenot recorded
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
Messagegood luck trying to make your reforms without the LAP. We're the largest party in parliament, and it seems we're fairly closely aligned with new democrats. I wouldn't count on the conservatives supporting your economic or social reforms either.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Imperial Cabinet Proposal of March 2041
MessageThe reforms mainly include more economic regulation and increasing government effort in the social domain. Not something I'd think you'd be in favour of.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 168

no
  

Total Seats: 107

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game.

    Random quote: "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 72