We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Health Morality Act
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2119
Description[?]:
| To put the morals back into Health Care. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Current: Euthanasia is only allowed with consent from the patient and a court order.
Proposed: Euthanasia is illegal and considered murder.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: Health care is entirely public and free; private clinics are banned.
Current: Health care is entirely private.
Proposed: Health care is private, but is paid for by the state for people with low incomes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:22:08, September 30, 2005 CET | From | Tudeh Party of Quanzar | To | Debating the Health Morality Act |
| Message | I entirely disagree with all of these articles. |
| Date | 03:58:41, October 01, 2005 CET | From | NeoSocialist Party | To | Debating the Health Morality Act |
| Message | Now there would be only one reason to have private Health Care, and that would be that it is arguably more efficient private than public. Yet, if we regulate prices, it will be the quality taking hits, so there is nothing economically acceptable in your proposal. Plus if we are going for subsdizing, which is a better alternative, we are going to spend just as much (because the Clinic will raise prices since there will be a boost in demand) to help private companies. And that I cannot accept |
| Date | 15:57:12, October 01, 2005 CET | From | Revival Party | To | Debating the Health Morality Act |
| Message | If article three were struck we could support this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 163 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "They should rule who are able to rule best." - Aristotle |