We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Kafuristan Defense Act One
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand National Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2122
Description[?]:
| A bill to set the nations policy for its defenses. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Current: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:30:15, September 30, 2005 CET | From |  Grand National Party | To | Debating the Kafuristan Defense Act One |
| Message | These are the base proposals for this military bill. I am reasearching the provisions here and also the nuclear weapons proposals. Add input and debate please. We are willing to compromise. |
| Date | 23:37:26, September 30, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian and Federalist Alliance | To | Debating the Kafuristan Defense Act One |
| Message | Yeh, seems okay. However I wouldn't put it to the vote until after the next election, because it's likely not to be passed in time, and will fail. |
| Date | 23:49:50, September 30, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Kafuristan Defense Act One |
| Message | I am unsure as to article 2. Sometimes, on a case-by-case basis, we may wish to deal with a close nation which is not an ally. Also, what would the restriction benefit? |
| Date | 03:05:20, October 05, 2005 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Kafuristan Defense Act One |
| Message | This bill has been amended. |
| Date | 18:41:38, October 05, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Kafuristan Defense Act One |
| Message | I now agree entirely. |
| Date | 17:25:08, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Kafuristan Defense Act One |
| Message | I support this proposal |
| Date | 03:38:29, October 07, 2005 CET | From | Helping party | To | Debating the Kafuristan Defense Act One |
| Message | that cool no bio's |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 300 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people and neither do we." - George W. Bush |