Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:43:58
Server time: 20:16:01, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): Archangel_1 | Brazil25 | Interstellar. | Liu Che | Maarten_saridan | Paulo Nogueira | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Coalition Cabinet Proposal

Details

Submitted by[?]: Holy Eliyahu Confession

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2630

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:54:45, September 01, 2008 CET
FromReformed Conservative Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal
MessageIn response to the Liberal Party's comment on the previous bill on this topic, the Conservative Party would like to reply that we are glad that they consider it to be a privilege to work with themselves. By the same standard, since my party has nearly twice as many seats in congress, we are near gods, no?

Date03:23:41, September 01, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal
MessageOOC: I love when new players think they know it all. The Christian Democrats (now the Christian League or something like that) know that if I actually want to get annoying I can bring dozens of laws to the table that you have never heard about but are still active and make your life impossible. If you show some respect, which I deserve, I'll be nice. Now, if you want to play smarty pants with me, well, that's not going to get you anywhere. In summary, I can be of great help if treated properly, I can be a pain in the butt if people try to make witty comments about me.

Date03:26:27, September 01, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal
Messageooc: oh no, your going to bury us with a bunch of history that nobody cares about! please, anything but that!

Date03:34:46, September 01, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal
MessageOOC: Honestly, you better stop your rhetoric. You know I can bring up many laws and make your life impossible. Why do you test me when you know I can do it? I recommend you minimize your rhetoric, for the sake of everyone.

Date03:36:48, September 01, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal
Messageooc: rhetoric? i thought we were just having a ooc conversation. whats with all the threatening? ive got no issue with you, but when you come arround and make statements like this, I begin to see that you take everything very personally.

Date04:28:39, September 01, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal
MessageOOC: I call rhetoric or sarcasm something like this: "oh no, your going to bury us with a bunch of history that nobody cares about! please, anything but that!"

First of all, this debate did not involve you but since I mention you, I understand you may want to reply. I am not threatening you in any way. I simply do not like people who make comments as the one quoted above. I have no issue with you either, I don't know you. As far as I know, you are a human being (correct?, just making sure) and yu are role playing a party. I do not even know if you are a Conservative or not, you do not even know if I am a Liberal or not. As far as I know, you are roleplaying a party. In summary, if I was angry at your comments, I would not have explained anything and simply replied in a nasty way, which I didn't. In additiion, let itbe noted that anything OOC is considered to be directed at the player not at the party or characters. Basically any OOC comments will be directed at MY person, not at my in-game party. That's why I take personally.

Date04:33:52, September 01, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal
MessageWell, what can we say? Another useless, inexperienced, and lame-duck cabinet.

OOC: For those who are new, anything IC such as the comment above is not directed at you but at your characters. As explained above, only OOC comments are directed at the player.

Date04:44:39, September 01, 2008 CET
FromReformed Conservative Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal
MessageOOC: I would welcome RPing with you according to preset laws of Lodamun, but only if they are organized in a comprehensive and easily sortable catalog. Feel free to bring up whatever bills you would like, and I will respond to them as needed. Enough bullying in relation to each other's "lives" in the game. I know that I have an exceptionally active life outside of this simulation, and I hope that you do too. Enough threats.


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 94

no
 

Total Seats: 12

abstain
   

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation.

Random quote: "Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64