We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Coalition Cabinet Proposal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Holy Eliyahu Confession
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2630
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President of the Commonwealth chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Free Peoples Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Christian Reformist Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Free Peoples Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Reformed Conservative Party of Lodamun
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Reformed Conservative Party of Lodamun
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Holy Eliyahu Confession
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Holy Eliyahu Confession
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Holy Eliyahu Confession
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Christian Reformist Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Christian Reformist Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Holy Eliyahu Confession
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Reformed Conservative Party of Lodamun
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:54:45, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Reformed Conservative Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal |
Message | In response to the Liberal Party's comment on the previous bill on this topic, the Conservative Party would like to reply that we are glad that they consider it to be a privilege to work with themselves. By the same standard, since my party has nearly twice as many seats in congress, we are near gods, no? |
Date | 03:23:41, September 01, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal |
Message | OOC: I love when new players think they know it all. The Christian Democrats (now the Christian League or something like that) know that if I actually want to get annoying I can bring dozens of laws to the table that you have never heard about but are still active and make your life impossible. If you show some respect, which I deserve, I'll be nice. Now, if you want to play smarty pants with me, well, that's not going to get you anywhere. In summary, I can be of great help if treated properly, I can be a pain in the butt if people try to make witty comments about me. |
Date | 03:26:27, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Holy Eliyahu Confession | To | Debating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal |
Message | ooc: oh no, your going to bury us with a bunch of history that nobody cares about! please, anything but that! |
Date | 03:34:46, September 01, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal |
Message | OOC: Honestly, you better stop your rhetoric. You know I can bring up many laws and make your life impossible. Why do you test me when you know I can do it? I recommend you minimize your rhetoric, for the sake of everyone. |
Date | 03:36:48, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Holy Eliyahu Confession | To | Debating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal |
Message | ooc: rhetoric? i thought we were just having a ooc conversation. whats with all the threatening? ive got no issue with you, but when you come arround and make statements like this, I begin to see that you take everything very personally. |
Date | 04:28:39, September 01, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal |
Message | OOC: I call rhetoric or sarcasm something like this: "oh no, your going to bury us with a bunch of history that nobody cares about! please, anything but that!" First of all, this debate did not involve you but since I mention you, I understand you may want to reply. I am not threatening you in any way. I simply do not like people who make comments as the one quoted above. I have no issue with you either, I don't know you. As far as I know, you are a human being (correct?, just making sure) and yu are role playing a party. I do not even know if you are a Conservative or not, you do not even know if I am a Liberal or not. As far as I know, you are roleplaying a party. In summary, if I was angry at your comments, I would not have explained anything and simply replied in a nasty way, which I didn't. In additiion, let itbe noted that anything OOC is considered to be directed at the player not at the party or characters. Basically any OOC comments will be directed at MY person, not at my in-game party. That's why I take personally. |
Date | 04:33:52, September 01, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal |
Message | Well, what can we say? Another useless, inexperienced, and lame-duck cabinet. OOC: For those who are new, anything IC such as the comment above is not directed at you but at your characters. As explained above, only OOC comments are directed at the player. |
Date | 04:44:39, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Reformed Conservative Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Coalition Cabinet Proposal |
Message | OOC: I would welcome RPing with you according to preset laws of Lodamun, but only if they are organized in a comprehensive and easily sortable catalog. Feel free to bring up whatever bills you would like, and I will respond to them as needed. Enough bullying in relation to each other's "lives" in the game. I know that I have an exceptionally active life outside of this simulation, and I hope that you do too. Enough threats. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 94 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 12 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 44 |
Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
Random quote: "Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill |