We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - Farming Subsidies
Details
Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2120
Description[?]:
| The AAP believes that the current law is too lax. It allows some 'farming families' to 'take it easy', if they so choose, in exchange for a kind of 'default wage'. That seems to us, to be discouraging Likatonian enterprise. Further, by subsidising farming 'families' - the current legislation is actively discriminating against cooperatives of OTHER kinds than familial. Thus - the AAP suggests a 'stewardship' Bill. Those who farm a non-profit crop, can, instead, turn to something environmentally 'conscious', and be 'subsidised' for helping the environment. Or they can choose to embrace market forces and grow a more profitable crop... the choice is up to the individual or group. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: The government subsidises the operations of low-income farming families.
Current: The government allows local governments to craft agricultural subsidy policy.
Proposed: Agricultural crops which are considered beneficial to the enviroment or to the continued ecological safety of the state are subsidized.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:16:49, October 03, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Reform Bill - Farming Subsidies |
| Message | The AAP thanks the RLP and the RWLP for their consideration, and, once again, for their support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 172 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 103 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "It is the hallmark of great society to debate and disagree without resorting to violence." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician |