We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2630
Details
Submitted by[?]: Imperium Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2631
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the New Liberal Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the New Liberal Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the New Liberal Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the New Liberal Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Imperium Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Imperium Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Humanist Alliance
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Humanist Alliance
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Humanist Alliance
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:46:50, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Imperium Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | Because absolutely nothing has been done since August 2629 (the Beluzian Government is alerted and have increased their defence budget 10x as much as us). The Imperium Party want to resign Jason Saynol as Minister of Defence and Arnold Zagetti as Minister of Foreign Affairs. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Beluzia, Sir Robert Barbossa, has privately contacted the Imperium Party, specifically Jason Saynol who allocated the troop deployment. I have stated that none of our members are part of the cabinet, and I explained the reasons why the deployment was made and I also cleared up the situation of "dont insult Beluzians" situations - which was stated in the Socialist League and Rutanian Democratic Forum's comments. They percieved our deployment as hostile, as if we are going to raid their border. The Imperium Party and Beluzian Nationalist Pirate Party (currently the largest party in Beluzia) have established good contact and friendly talk. If you want this matter to be soughted out vote yes, I'll bring this situation to a finish, and of course once this situation is over Mr Saynol and Mr Zagetti will resign. Percival van Rustenburg Imperium Party Leader |
| Date | 15:20:46, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Forum | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | "Mr Speaker, we vote against this proposal. Why? We would support Imperium Party's ministers to deal with this situation, but we already have our government. We demand diplomatic solution, Beluzia is our neighbour country and our diplomatic relations ought to be good. Therefore, we demand an action from Tom Duke, Minister of Foreign Affairs from Humanist Alliance and Keaton Jenner, Minister of Defence from New Liberal Party. We also want to ask Mrs Chancellor General Melissa Hockey from New Liberal Party what actions are and are planned to be taken. We believe that one of the reasons for this crisis was also incompetency of some key members of last government, particularly Chancellor General Gregory Heffernan from Humanist Alliance. Now, we should have more competent government. Even the Conservatives have supported current government. So, ladies and gentlemen, if you are competent, then solve this situation. If you're not competent, then please resign." Michael Ford, MNC President of RDF |
| Date | 15:23:34, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Forum | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | "Mr Rustenburg, if you have established friendly relations with Beluzian Nationalist Pirate Party, why do they seek troop deployment in front of Beluzian parliament, and why do they obviously increase tensions?" M.Ford |
| Date | 18:00:50, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Socialist League for a new society | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | we oppose |
| Date | 18:50:04, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Imperium Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | Myself and Sir Robert Barbossa of the Beluzian Nationalist Pirate Party have established friendly relations with each other, it is not directly related to Rutania and Beluzia Hostility, I have recieved his terms of what the situation is, and if we do not call off the troops by July, further action will be taken by the government of Beluzia. I've sent a message to the minister not to make the deadline to July. (ooc: in account of our time zone differences) And Mr Ford, with respect the current cabinet has not dealt with this situation and they have been given enough time to try and sought this. Percival van Rustenburg Imperium Party Leader |
| Date | 20:03:20, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Forum | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | "Mr Barbossa should be aware of one thing: it's not us who make threats. Rutania has responded to threat and proposal from Beluzia, because some of their political groups and parties openly advocate the invasion to Rutania. So, our deployment of troops is a matter of our defence and our national security. We don't want to attack them. Therefore, RDF does not support calling off the additional troops from Delvar. We strongly oppose that actions and would like to clear up things: Beluzian groups are threatening Rutania, not otherwise. Current government has done nothing to clear this situation. RDF supports IP's efforts to clear the situation, but we will not vote for the government which included Humanist Alliance and New Liberal Party." Michael Ford, MNC President of RDF |
| Date | 10:07:31, September 02, 2008 CET | From | Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | "The government does not have to clear everything with the opposition especially when it is thought that we may have spies among us. All information is on a need to know basis and that is all" |
| Date | 10:57:05, September 02, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Forum | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | "You don't have to clear anything with opposition, you have to clear things with Beluzia and Bailon!" Michael Ford |
| Date | 14:07:39, September 02, 2008 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2630 |
| Message | We suggest you start listening to the Imperium Party.... they seem to be the only people who would rather not fight a war with a nation with a far superior army. Also you may want to look at this: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=216189 We have many allies, and it would be wise to withdraw your troops. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 167 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 432 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
| Random quote: "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky |