Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:17:03
Server time: 12:42:56, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Luzzina | Twilighty00 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 2630

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sons of Liberty

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2631

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:19:18, September 02, 2008 CET
FromSons of Liberty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2630
MessageWe call upon the FPP and NBP to eschew the DFP and their questionable politics to have such control over the executive branch of this nation. By this movement, we all stand for the individual rights on civic matters, which we believe the most important part of any of this. As the NBP had quoted of Heinlein, "Its like saying grown men have to live off of skim milk 'cause the baby can't have steak."

Thus I beg of the other socially free parties; let us eschew the theocratic movement we oppose and form a coalition against such.

We remind that under this proposal, each of you stands to gain more cabinetary seats, as well.

Date14:50:05, September 02, 2008 CET
FromDranland First Party (CC)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2630
MessageRidiculous - the minarchist libertarian parties happily joining forces with the statist, supposedly fascist NBP? This is a strange development indeed.
Perhaps the libertarian bloc simply fears the potential possibility of a shared conservative\DFP cabinet. The libertarians are merely using the NBP for their considerable voting power in order to craft the most progressive cabinet they possibly can, given that the libertarian parties do not have a majority in themselves.

Date18:21:15, September 02, 2008 CET
FromNational Bolshevik Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2630
MessageWe like to think of ourselves as a syncretic movement which takes the ethical judgments of Objectivism and relates them better to the biological imperative for survival, where the technocratic reforms come in. We're a little complicated but the SOL's stalwart defense of individual rights is very important to our philosophy of Creator ethos.

Date18:24:07, September 02, 2008 CET
FromNational Bolshevik Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2630
MessageWe will have to honor our cabinet with the DFP of course. We provide a counterbalance to the uber-libertarian head of state and the socially conservative bloc of the DFP, CPP, and TCP cannot pass legislation.

Date18:29:38, September 02, 2008 CET
FromNational Bolshevik Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2630
MessageYet. . .

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 92

no
   

Total Seats: 138

abstain
 

Total Seats: 35


Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

Random quote: "I've been against the death penalty since I was in law school in 1950. It's horrible, discriminatory, and undermines the credibility of the criminal justice system." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56