We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119
Details
Submitted by[?]: National People's Gang
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2119
Description[?]:
Finance Minister Comrade Bliss Gate, of The Refuseniks, proposes to adjust the government's spending budget to steadily reduce identified surpluses through a reduction in the tax on luxuries while also curbing government spending during the period of settling in the economic tools available. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Tax percentage of the profit made by corporations.
Old value:: 10
Current: 30
Proposed: 13
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 40
Current: 25
Proposed: 35
Article 3
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,000,000 LOD |
Foreign Affairs | 4,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 2,600,000,000 LOD |
Internal Affairs | 6,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,500,000,000 LOD |
Finance | 1,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,500,000,000 LOD |
Defence | 11,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,500,000,000 LOD |
Justice | 5,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 3,000,000,000 LOD |
Infrastructure and Transport | 7,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 3,000,000,000 LOD |
Health and Social Services | 20,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 3,000,000,000 LOD |
Education and Culture | 17,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 3,800,000,000 LOD |
Science and Technology | 2,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 3,000,000,000 LOD |
Total | 76,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 22,901,000,000 LOD |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:13:52, October 01, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | We are split on this. We support the budget, except for the adjustment to defense. We currently have Deltaria and Kanjor threatening us, and cutting our Defense budget by such a significant amount is insane. |
Date | 23:52:35, October 01, 2005 CET | From | National People's Gang | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | The "Dxxxxxxx and Kxxxxx" issue has been settled by Lodamun's Foreign Ministry following the deployment and delivery of the most cost effective weapon in our arsenal. |
Date | 00:01:33, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | I'm sorry, but you're going to have to clarify that a bit more... What?! |
Date | 02:59:14, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | I can clarify that for you - they've been IGNORED by me, and I'm the Foreign Minister, remember? Most, if not all, RP would have to go through me, OR a Citizens Assembly vote/discussion. |
Date | 03:33:49, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | (Mixed IC and OOC:) Gotcha. That's kindof what I thought he meant, but there was a possibility he meant something else. I wouldnt really consider this method to be an IC weapon, however. I still can't justify such a steep defense cut, however. If you remember, TiC held that Defense and Justice are the two valid priorities of a government. I'm not certain what I'm going to do with the Remnants or the soon-to-be-reconstituted party, however. Suggestions are welcome, my creativity is finite and it is far easier to simply follow actual politics(though loosely), than to play a completely imagined party. |
Date | 04:59:59, October 02, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | Deltaria and/or Kanjor would have to be crazy to attack us (Well, more crazy than they already are). They'd have Rutania and Baltusia declare war on them, followed by atleast Endralon and Tukarali. |
Date | 06:06:23, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | "Deltaria and/or Kanjor would have to be crazy to attack us (Well, more crazy than they already are). They'd have Rutania and Baltusia declare war on them, followed by atleast Endralon and Tukarali." I agree. However the problem still exists that they seem to be insane fascists bent on world destruction. |
Date | 19:07:29, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | re Deltaria: we need to know iof we are ignoring the entire country, or just their dumb hostage RP. I'd be prepared to accept that D**** exists and is a fascist state bent on world destruction, but i'm not prepared to believe that we took no precautions to protect our diplomats, knowing that Deltarians are insane warmongers. And i am not prepared to believe that any democratic state (ie all states in the game) are supporting them. Let's make a statement that we IGNORE war RP until it's implemented -- especially since all war RP is initiated by idiot teenage boys spoiling for a fight. Countries like Lodamun and Rutania composed of people with at least half a brain and a rudimentary knowledge of politics should not be dragged into idiotic non-consensual RP of the "w3 nooooks U lol" style. |
Date | 19:21:03, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Prudency in Budgeting proposal of March 2119 |
Message | Perhaps we can draft a "We are ignoring RP war" treaty? Any nations that sign it can be immune from war until it actually exists. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 159 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 113 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 28 |
Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
Random quote: "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington |