We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Act of 2635
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Capitalist Delegation
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2636
Description[?]:
Should the second proposed cabinet of President Margaret Jones fail to pass, this resolution will be put to vote requesting that President Jones immediately propose the following cabinet. Head of Government - Democratic Capitalist Delegation Foreign Affairs - Democratic Capitalist Delegation Internal Affairs - Radical Party Finance - Radical Party Defence - Regional Acronym Political Establishment Justice - New Humanitarian Party Infrastructure and Transport - Telamon Tourism Industry Employees Union Health and Social Services - Libertarian Labour Party Education and Culture - Democratic Capitalist Delegation Science and Technology - Libertarian Labour Party Food and Agriculture - New Humanitarian Party Environment and Tourism - Telamon Tourism Industry Employees Union Trade and Industry - Regional Acronym Political Establishment Should this bill gain over a 50% majority, as soon as it does it should be recognized as an official demand of this Parliament and therefore an official representative demand of the population of Telamon. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:59:59, September 11, 2008 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Act of 2635 |
Message | Would this just compromise the one power the President has. I guess it would leave the ultimate decision up to the TNP though to let the bill happen. The TNP could deny the majority, it would be the President's constitutional right, like a veto. But the bill has to pass first, I'm getting ahead of myself. |
Date | 18:15:56, September 11, 2008 CET | From | United Labour Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Cabinet Act of 2635 |
Message | We will support this bill; however, President Jones does not have to do this per the constitution. |
Date | 19:19:00, September 11, 2008 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Act of 2635 |
Message | Mr Woodson has more chance in knitting fog, the TNP has tried such motions under a RP presidency and they rejected it so to think we will accept this is really a complete and utter joke. So putting this forward will be a waste of everyone's time. Margaret Jones, Telamon President. |
Date | 19:39:38, September 11, 2008 CET | From | Rightful Radical Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Act of 2635 |
Message | Please Mr Woodson, how many times have you liberals proposed a cabinet when we were in majority and you had the presidential position? I'll tell you: never. We have always urged for you to do that, which occurred several times but you never even thought of that. Don't be sore losers now. Stefan Barna RRP |
Date | 01:14:12, September 12, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Capitalist Delegation | To | Debating the Cabinet Act of 2635 |
Message | To address the concerns that this act would violate the President's right to propose a cabinet: Should this bill pass, it would be an official demand of Parliament, but the President would not be bound by law to propose such a cabinet. Secondly, to address the point made by President Jones, it should be noted that the only two cabinet acts ever put to vote by the TNP were both defeated. Why should the President even have considered proposing such cabinets? Don't take my word for it though, good members of Parliament, examine the resolutions for yourselves. Cabinet Act of 2615 http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=210417 Cabinet Act 2 of 2615 http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=210540 Thirdly, to address the point of the RRP, this is not what we consider being a "sore loser." If we accused the conservatives of foul play or dirty tactics, that would be acting as a "sore loser." Expressing ourselves through a Democratic forum however, should be viewed as exactly the opposite of that, would you not agree Mr. Barna? This resolution will now be put to vote as President Jones has once again failed to form a new government. Daunte Woodson Chairman Democratic Capitalist Delegation |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 245 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 207 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 49 |
Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information. |
Random quote: "Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary." - Mahatma Gandhi |