Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5471
Next month in: 00:51:35
Server time: 15:08:24, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2638

Details

Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2638

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet, according to election laws:
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=198268 (expires 2694)

Here's the math (rounding in representation, but not in calculation):
DSP: 165/600=.28>*13=3.58 > 3
AUP: 138/600=.23>*13=2.99 > 3
NPP: 75/600=.13>*13=1.63 > 2
CP: 74/600=.12>*13=1.60 > 2
MTPU: 59/600=.10>*13=1.28 > 1
SIP: 51/600=.09>*13=1.11 > 1
SGP: 29/600=.05>*13=0.63 > 1
SD: 9/600=.02>*13=0.20 > 0

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:37:53, September 17, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2638
MessageCongratulations to the Green Party for getting their first cabinet position. I hope they find it acceptable.

Date07:38:20, September 17, 2008 CET
FromSekowo Green Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2638
MessageNo objections from the SGP.

Date07:44:03, September 17, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2638
MessageIf it did'nt mean essentially being barred form the cabinet it would be interesting to see how not having proportion laws would make things.
I'm actually betting it would'nt change things since you need more then half the legislature, and it's pretty hard to do that with less then four parties agreeing.
Oh well, this system has made us one of the most stable nations, so I suppose no reason to change things.

Date07:49:23, September 17, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2638
MessageNot having proportion laws would mostly just get you disenfranchized from the Cabinet, I think. =

Date07:57:17, September 17, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2638
MessageMaybe, maybe not, my old strategy was just to give myself the three positions I really like (Foreign Affairs, Finance, Sci/Tech) then just let everyone decide what they wanted with the rest.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 526

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 74


    Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved.

    Random quote: "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - John Adams

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71