Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5472
Next month in: 00:01:16
Server time: 15:58:43, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reduction of Government Bill Party Two 2119

Details

Submitted by[?]: Tories

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2124

Description[?]:

The Second in what will be a long line of Reduction of Government Bills.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:25:34, October 02, 2005 CET
FromAnarchist-Communist League
ToDebating the Reduction of Government Bill Party Two 2119
MessageThis proposal would simply worsen the position of the workers, the creators of wealth in our society.

Date12:51:00, October 03, 2005 CET
FromTudeh Party of Quanzar
ToDebating the Reduction of Government Bill Party Two 2119
MessageAgreed, ACL.

Date00:14:30, October 11, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Reduction of Government Bill Party Two 2119
Messagelol What wealth, if everything is free, there is no wealth

Date04:46:01, October 11, 2005 CET
FromNeoSocialist Party
ToDebating the Reduction of Government Bill Party Two 2119
MessageThat's probably the most senseless economist phrase I have EVER heard.

Anyway Education completely volountary is just a justification to cut education subsidies eventually. What a beautiful society, rich not only will grow richer, but will also be the only ones to get knowledge.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 184

no
     

Total Seats: 187

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "I am thankful for the taxes I pay because it means that I'm employed." - Nancie J. Carmody

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70