Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 01:41:46
Server time: 14:18:13, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Brazil25 | Caoimhean | Luzzina | Paulo Nogueira | Twilighty00 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Anti-"Greater Likatonia" Treaty

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2644

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Anti-"Greater Likatonia" Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:32:50, September 28, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Anti-"Greater Likatonia" Treaty
MessageIs there going to be any complaints at to who has ratified the treaty now?

Date19:25:49, September 28, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Anti-"Greater Likatonia" Treaty
MessageWow, some country ratified it. So why should we jump off the bridge too?

Date22:26:06, September 28, 2008 CET
FromReformed Conservative Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Ratification of the Anti-"Greater Likatonia" Treaty
MessageWe would need to see nearly twice the amount of current support for this Treaty to support it. We also would like to remind the legislature of Lodamun that this treaty was written some 16 years ago, and may not address the current Likatonian situation.

Date22:34:56, September 28, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Anti-"Greater Likatonia" Treaty
MessageThe Likatonian situation is always the same, we do not deal with them.

Date18:24:30, September 29, 2008 CET
FromRightful Radical Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Anti-"Greater Likatonia" Treaty
MessageYou never know when can the same issue step forth. Why have our faithful Lodamun friends deserted us? We have been always great supporters of your country. We have a successful free-trade agreement that brought many good to both of our nations [http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=1013].

Vojislav Krkljus
Foreign Affairs Minister
Government of the Republic of Telamon

Date20:54:53, September 29, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Anti-"Greater Likatonia" Treaty
MessageAs the Rightful Radical Party already knows, the Liberal Party has always been a supporter of this treaty and all other treaties with Telamon. It seems that some parties here in this country do not know how threatening Likatonia is and how much damage they have done to us in the past. We will keep fighting for the passing of this treaty. That is our promise to Telamon.

Clare Gaither
National Chairperson for the Liberal Party and Co-Chairperson and CFO of Stricker Naval Ops., Inc.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 47

no
    

Total Seats: 90

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum.

    Random quote: "Society comprises two classes: those who have more food than appetite, and those who have more appetite than food." - Nicolas Chamfort

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57