Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 01:36:29
Server time: 06:23:30, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Infrastructure Action Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2645

Description[?]:

An act to privatise some aspects of infrastructure.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:11:46, September 30, 2008 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Action Act
MessageDebate about proposals in this bill has been covered in the Second Reform Act.

Date00:25:33, October 01, 2008 CET
FromHobrazian Extraordinary Gentlemen's Club
ToDebating the Infrastructure Action Act
MessageDid our party understood it correctly that :
a) removed government from "control" of the power grid sphere with Second Reform Act - to allow private companies enter and represent it
b) with current act turn private companIES into single private company?
c) how SINGLE governmental company differs from SINGLE private company? The money instead of governmental sector are flowing in hands of few lucky individuals?



Date07:57:34, October 01, 2008 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Action Act
Message"a) removed government from "control" of the power grid sphere with Second Reform Act - to allow private companies enter and represent it" - No, the Second Reform Act allows private companies to control energy generation, this act allows a private company to maintain the POWER GRID.

"b) with current act turn private companIES into single private company?"- I don't think I understand. WE believe that the power grid should be owned by one single united private company instead of multiple ones, as this may create arguments within the sector and threaten the industry. And it simplifies it for those involved A LOT.

"c) how SINGLE governmental company differs from SINGLE private company? The money instead of governmental sector are flowing in hands of few lucky individuals?" - I think most of you are quite aware of how we feel about this. The private sector can achieve efficiency, quality and good prices which are beyond the reach of the public sector, and stimulate a free economy at the same time.

As I said, this has already been discussed in the Second Reform Act discussion.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 123

no
   

Total Seats: 165

abstain
  

Total Seats: 112


Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that.

Random quote: "Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it. " - Thomas Paine

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54