We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2646
Description[?]:
| I don't think this requires an explanation, but for those amongst us who insist, I leave you with this: Σωκρατικός λόγος or Σωκρατικός διάλογος |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 715
Current: 250
Proposed: 75
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:39:49, October 03, 2008 CET | From | Free CRABWALKING =3 | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | WTF |
| Date | 11:35:17, October 03, 2008 CET | From | Free Party | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | Crack the code. |
| Date | 13:30:12, October 03, 2008 CET | From | Free Gay Marsians (fully sic) | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | ...Socratic dialogue? mama mia |
| Date | 01:59:40, October 04, 2008 CET | From | Free Brendan Nelson | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | I dont really see why, but I'll support in the name of bipartisanship |
| Date | 02:35:42, October 04, 2008 CET | From | Free Party | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | I can't believe this thing is getting supported. Doesn't it just reduce the accuracy of our respective powers slightly by reducing the number of seats? |
| Date | 06:07:42, October 04, 2008 CET | From | Free Gay Marsians (fully sic) | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | Yes. Effectively, smaller parties will be at a disadvantage - proportionally. Let's say if there was a bloc of parties - which would in turn have a high chance to gain a large percentage of the vote - the power would be shifted to the bloc of parties, effectively gaining total control over the legislative process. Not that that applies here or anything |
| Date | 06:19:29, October 04, 2008 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | Metaphorically, it would be operating on a decreased resolution, yes. Potentially less costly, markedly improved "framerates" through shorter deliberation, but this coming through a council with greater inaccuracy in terms of both political balance and rougher regional seat distributions. |
| Date | 06:21:24, October 04, 2008 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | It won't exclusively be smaller parties at a disadvantage, though. With the resolution metaphor, one could imagine the point when a small object occupies its first few pixels. The increase of one pixel is a notable gain, and at the loss of the neighbouring rendered item. |
| Date | 07:16:25, October 04, 2008 CET | From | Free CRABWALKING =3 | To | Debating the I believe this will benefit Kafuristan greatly. |
| Message | It's easier to calculate how many seats are needed for const. change: fitty. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 462 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 89 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position. |
| Random quote: "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson |