We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Minor Civil Liberty Reform (2647)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2648
Description[?]:
Studies have shown again and again that criminals are significantly more likely to come from one-parent households. Our adoption laws should try to discourage this. In addition, local communities and governments should have the right to determine whether or not public nudity is appropriate for their environment. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Only couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Proposed: Public nudity laws are left to local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:13:59, October 05, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the Minor Civil Liberty Reform (2647) |
Message | Perhaps if there was some incentive for us, we would vote yes on this. |
Date | 23:58:03, October 05, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Minor Civil Liberty Reform (2647) |
Message | We are against stripping people of civil liberties because some people don't know how to look the other way as well as the questionable results of so called studies. OOC: Just like polls I refuse to accept the results of any kind of study (regardless of if I like the results or not) unless more then half of the total populace of the group is included as it's the only way to be accurate. |
Date | 03:47:49, October 06, 2008 CET | From | Sekowan Independent Party | To | Debating the Minor Civil Liberty Reform (2647) |
Message | OOC: Actually, representative samples are very likely to be accurate. They take a representative sample of the population, which means that their results reflect the overall population. The sample is checked against census demographics for accuracy, and then studies are repeated over time to ensure the data is accurate. Polls are, in fact, relatively accurate. Just FYI. :P IC: We are opposed to stripping the people of such basic liberties as being allowed to follow their beliefs. If a conservative family wishes to raise their family in a conservative manner, then there should not be laws in place to keep that from happening. Local governments will have better ability to accurately enforce the will of their populations. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 231 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 278 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 91 |
Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum! |
Random quote: "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated" - Mahatma Gandhi |