We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Power Efficiency
Details
Submitted by[?]: Supporters of Science in Design (IP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2648
Description[?]:
This legislation seeks to make Malivian power generation and transmission more efficient. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: Each region owns and maintains its own power grid.
Current: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Proposed: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:44:45, October 06, 2008 CET | From | One-Voice Party (IP) | To | Debating the Power Efficiency |
Message | OVP concurs with Art. 02. However, don't you think power generation would be much efficient, faster and easier to maintain if it is federalized? Using an analogy of series circuit versus parallel circuit: In a series circuit, every device must function. A set of light bulbs in series with one bulb burning out, kills the circuit. In parallel, every light has its own circuit, so all but one light could be burned out, and the last one will still illuminate. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 55 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 20 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
Random quote: "It is vain to talk of the interest of the community, without understanding what is the interest of the individual" - Jeremy Bentham |