We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: POW Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2121
Description[?]:
We understand the reservations some may have about this but feel that providing POWs with food and shelter would lead to better treatment of our own. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the treatment of prisoners of war.
Old value:: Prisoners of war are treated according to the national laws of the captor power.
Current: Prisoners of war must be treated well, according to internationally-accepted standards.
Proposed: Prisoners of war must be treated well, according to internationally-accepted standards.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:13:28, October 03, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | How do you know our national laws are internationally accpeted. =) |
Date | 21:25:23, October 03, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | aren't^ |
Date | 22:29:27, October 03, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | How do you know they are? That arguement is weak and irrelevent. |
Date | 23:37:04, October 03, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | We can agree to this, the soliders must not be punished for there goverments choices. the nazis forced people to fight even them who didnt agree with nazism. |
Date | 23:47:15, October 03, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | Have you looked at our laws? No torture.....because they would be considered low income, they would have free access to lawyers and health, and technically education as well. You just don't know our laws well. The most they'd have to worry about is the death penalty........ooooooooooooooooh. RP, you just have no idea what your talking about. This proposal is retarded. |
Date | 05:10:33, October 04, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | You generally don't give POW's lawyers. They are interned until the conflict is over, or until an exchange of prisoners is agreed upon. You cannot arbitrarily execute a POW, as that leaves our own soldiers open for retaliatory actions. I have a very good idea of what I am talking about, having studied military history, but you won't believe that, since I can't prove it online. |
Date | 07:44:08, October 04, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | wait, why the hell would a POW need a lawyer? Its no crime to be a soldier, and if they did go to court, what are they trying to prove? Whether or not they are actually soldiers? Conservitives, you dont know much at all do you. |
Date | 09:16:34, October 04, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | I will in fact support this. although i belive the current law is ok as a present laws are far better than many other nations, this will protect POWs should any future government attempt to change are national laws in a manner that would adversely affect POWs. |
Date | 18:32:11, October 04, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the POW Rights |
Message | Thank you for seeing the logic of that UCA |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 214 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 41 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password. |
Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli |