Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 03:51:10
Server time: 16:08:49, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Lab47AU | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Impeachment Against President Violet Baker

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2652

Description[?]:

We hereby impeach President Violet Baker for the following reasons:

Article 1:

She knowingly and intentionally accepted fraudulent campaign contributions to gain an unfair advantage.

Article 2:

By the actions described in Article 1, she violated the campaign laws of this country.


This impeachment process will take place as set forth by the Impeachment Process Act (http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=196617).

This bill will proceed to a vote to allow debate on the impeachment. A majority of votes present is needed to allow debate. Upon reaching the 50% +1 threashold, the debate on the impeachment will begin.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:08:55, October 14, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageWhat exactly do you base these accusations on?

Date07:24:23, October 14, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageRead the newspapers.

Date07:25:08, October 14, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageThe President, as head of the campaign, is responsible for all actions within her campaign, whether she knew about them or not.

Date07:27:51, October 14, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageSo the charges are ones the Liberal party fabricated with no evidence based on laws that do not exist? Comforting.

Date07:28:49, October 14, 2008 CET
From Partie Libertaire Chrétienne
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
Messageooc: play nice children.

Date07:33:17, October 14, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageAre you saying that given false names for campaign contributions is not illegal?

Date07:34:59, October 14, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageOOC: I am playing nicely. I am just having some fun. Isn't that what this game is all about? Honestly, I am through with arguing with people. Now, I sit back and let them fight with themselves.

Date07:39:07, October 14, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageI won't answer your hypotheticals. Please provide evidence that false names were on campaign contributions and produce the law you claim is broken. The Liberal Party presented these "charges." So please explain why impeachment is warranted by providing specifics because while I'm willing to answer specific charges, I will not be goaded into a Liberal witch hunt.

Date14:44:34, October 14, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageOnce this bill reaches the majority threasdhold necessary, more evidence will be provided.

Date00:01:21, October 15, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageWhat evidence? How can you vote to begin impeachment when there is no evidence?

Date01:45:01, October 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageThe evidence has been released by the Internal Affairs Ministry. CHECK THE NEWSPAPER!!!

Date01:46:16, October 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageImpeachment will begin if there is a majority of votes present in the affirmative.

Date02:39:06, October 15, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageOOC: I read the newspaper. There is no evidence of laws broken. A partisan report with no basis in fact is not evidence. Please provide evidence. As for RP - this is bad. I will no longer participate because there is no valid rp here. When the Foreign Minister broke specific laws passed by the Senate governing RP you complained to the mods. I wonder how in your mind this action is valid when no law is broken (you have been unable to produce ANY law citing restrictions on campaign contributions and the Liberal Party cannot roleplay contributions made to another party.

Date03:12:04, October 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageOOC: First of all, this is a bill to allow debate. I do not have to produce any evidence now. The Foreign Affairs Minister situation was totally different as you tried to incapacitate my character. You keep bring it up when it was already dealt with by a moderator. As far as roleplay, I can claim anything I want, whenever I want. I control the Internal Affairs Ministry, I roleplay it. Any illegal action within this country is under the jurisdiction of the Internal Affairs Ministry. I never mentioned your characters by name in the news report. That is good ropleplaying. I am afraid that impeachment is not something you chose to participate in or not. If your character gets impeached and removed, it loses its powers. Again, we are not violating the roleplaying rules because we are not incapacitating your character. If this legislature finds that the accusations are credible enough, and removes the President, you have no choice but to abide by it. I understand you disagree with the accusations but there is a big difference between disagreement and it being a clerical error (foreign affairs Minister controversy). You can go ahead and disagree but since we are not violating the roloplaying rules, this impeachment is valid as long as the Senate votes for it.

Date03:12:31, October 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Impeachment Against President Violet Baker
MessageOOC: Everything cannot be your way everytime.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 71

no
 

Total Seats: 59

abstain
 

Total Seats: 20


Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

Random quote: "You cannot open a book without learning something." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61