We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Medical Access
Details
Submitted by[?]: Supporters of Science in Design (IP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2652
Description[?]:
This treaty prevents us from allowing patients a wide range of medical options. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Anti Drug Trade.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:39:26, October 15, 2008 CET | From | One-Voice Party (IP) | To | Debating the Medical Access |
Message | Adding one drug would not make any significant difference. If a doctor is smart enough, he would be able to choose and prescribe a much efficient medicine from a available variety of safe medicines over a drug that has adverse effects overwhelming its medicinal advantages to a patient. Not all illnesses are treated by cannabis. Also, recreational is not parallel to medicinal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 46 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 29 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules. |
Random quote: "Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the US media." - Noam Chomsky |