We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Labour (Retirement) Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2653
Description[?]:
| An act to increase the age of retirement. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 68
Current: 60
Proposed: 70
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:25:12, October 16, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Labour (Retirement) Amendment Act |
| Message | People live longer these days, they should be working, not living off government handouts. |
| Date | 19:19:32, October 16, 2008 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Labour (Retirement) Amendment Act |
| Message | no, 68 is enough |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 438 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 62 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
| Random quote: "Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage." - Niccolo Machiavelli |