We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Institutions Act, 2653
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2654
Description[?]:
| An act to prevent fascism and mililtary control from ever resulting from a 'serious emergency'. We should never ever give the military a chance to participate in the conduction of law and order, no matter the circumstances. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:12:26, October 18, 2008 CET | From | Grand Liberal Party | To | Debating the Civil Institutions Act, 2653 |
| Message | The Grand Liberal Party are beginning to question why the Progressive Conservative Party is in power. We would like an answer as to why this is a good idea. The civilian police force is not always good enough to deal with all emergencies, and it is physically impossible to prevent all serious emergencies. If we just allow the military to stand around while there is a nation wide crisis on our hands, then we aren't looking out for our people. We hope all parties will see this, and vote no to this bill, as we are. David Collins Leader & Founder of the Grand Liberal Party. |
| Date | 16:46:26, October 18, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Restoration Party | To | Debating the Civil Institutions Act, 2653 |
| Message | After much consideration, the OP has decided the current law is the best way to defend the people's freedom and liberties. The military only comes in when needed, so there is no fear of fascism. However, I believe we shouldn't have jumped into voting so soon and spend time debating the issue at hand. -William Durden, Orange Party |
| Date | 04:05:37, October 19, 2008 CET | From | Grand Liberal Party | To | Debating the Civil Institutions Act, 2653 |
| Message | We are requesting that the Progressive Conservative Party give a reason as to why this is a good idea. This is a matter of safety. More parties believe in the old law, than the current, and what you're doing is using your seat gain to your advantage by making old proposals that weren't passed, easier to pass now. This is not the way the Rutanian Government should work, and your party is certainly not the right choice for Rutania if this is the kind of thing you propose, with no backing statement. David Collins Leader & Founder of the Grand Liberal Party. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 353 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 246 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
| Random quote: "The spirit of democracy is not a mechanical thing to be adjusted by abolition of forms. It requires change of heart." - Mahatma Gandhi |